Guides

Can recruiters tell if you used AI to write your CV?

Often, yes. AI-written CVs share a vocabulary and a rhythm that experienced recruiters notice, and the giveaway is usually vagueness where specifics should be. Using AI is not the problem. Use it for structure, ordering and phrasing, then make sure every claim, number and project detail is yours.

What gives it away

No single one of these proves anything. Together they read as a CV that was described to a machine rather than written by the person who did the work.

Detection tools are not the real risk

AI detection tools are unreliable and produce false positives on ordinary formal writing, and most recruiters are not running CVs through them. The screening is done by reading.

The real check is the interview. If your CV describes a project in language you cannot sustain when someone asks about it for ten minutes, that is where it costs you.

Most employers do not mind the tool

AI-assisted writing is now common enough that most recruiters assume it. What they object to is not the tool, it is a CV that is generic or inaccurate, which is what you get from handing the whole task over.

Some applications ask directly whether you used AI, and some graduate schemes restrict it. Read the question and answer it honestly.

How to use it without the tells

How we do it

We rewrite your CV against a specific posting using the facts already in it, reordering and rephrasing rather than generating new claims. Your underlying CV stays the source of truth, so nothing turns up in a tailored version that you did not put there.

Updated 2026-09-06

Related

Can recruiters tell if you used AI to write your CV? | Astrahunter